Crimean Astrophys. Observatory, 98409, Nauchny, Crimea, Ukraine
2000, Astrophysical Journal 540, 1143.
It is generally accepted that a two-ribbon flare (TRF) is due
to a reconnection process which happens in previously open magnetic
field. Here we use the BBSO high resolution observations of the
longitudinal magnetic field and H_alpha, and YOHKOH images of AR NOAA
8375, as well as a numerical method for reconstruction of the linear
force-free field and we show that the 2B/M8.4 two-ribbon flare on Nov
5, 1998 was a result of many reconnection processes between closed
magnetic loops.
Figure 1 shows GOES soft X-ray flux as a function of
time. There were two large-scale events of energy release. The first
one happened about 19:35 UT.
Figure 2 shows H_alpha images of the TRF obtained at the center of the
spectral line. This long duration event lasted for several hours. It
was a large flare which extended over the whole active region. No
filament was present in this AR prior to the flare onset. The H_alpha
image (19:43:35 UT) shows three well developed flare ribbons also
marked with letters A, B, C. The second flare started at about
22:18 UT. After the X-ray flux reached its maximum, the GOES light
curve has broken its gradual decrease and has formed plateau. This
might be also seen in H_alpha images (Figure 2). After the eastern
ribbon A has faded, the south-east ribbon D became
brighter.
Figure 3 is H_alpha images obtained at the red wing of the spectral
line. The post-flare loop system (dark loops) connected flare ribbons
B and C (which was located just in the umbra of the
sunspot) and showed apparent growth. The off-band images reveal a
strong downflow at the loop footpoints. The image at 20:56:35 UT is a
contrast enhanced image. The flare ribbons appear brighter then it was
observed.
Figure 4 shows locations of H_alpha flare ribbons
(dashed area) and a contour map of the longitudinal magnetic field
(solid - N polarity). Solid lines 1, 2, 3 denote calculated field-lines
connecting the areas a and b with the flare ribbons
A and B. Divides between a, b and c areas
(the thick closed contours) are the intersection of separatrices with
the photosphere and represent the photospheric boundaries of different
magnetic fluxes. These boundaries are places where a drastic change in
the field-line linkage occurs. Discontinuities in the field-line
linkage at the boundary are at the origin of the formation of current
sheets.
The figure shows, that H_alpha flare ribbons were located at the
separatrices. This suggests, that reconnection between magnetic flux
represented with line 1 and the flux shown with lines 2 and 3 will
create new magnetic loops systems: the H$\alpha$ post-flare loop system
and a giant X-ray post-flare arch connecting the area a and the
flare ribbon A.
Figure 5 shows H_alpha + 0.75A image taken at 20:56:35 UT. Dark loops
at upper right - growing post-flare loops system (PFL). Solid lines are
calculated field-lines connecting the area b with the flare
ribbon A. Dashed lines - calculated field lines which connect
the area c with the flare ribbon D. The newly formed,
after the first step of reconnection, post flare loops system and the
giant X-ray post-flare arch exhibits apparent growth and thus,
disturbs the pre-existing overlaying magnetic field. This might provoke
the subsequent reconnection of the newly formed loops with the loops
system which connects the area c and the flare ribbon D.
This second-step reconnection should start a bit later than the main
phase of the energy release and corresponds to the second energy
release event see in Figure 1.
Figure 6 shows the off-band H_alpha image (the same as in Figure 3)
with an overlapped SXT/YOHKOH image. One clearly sees the presence of
both the low-lying H_alpha post-flare loop system (dark loops) and the
overlaying hot X-ray giant coronal arch (a white loop with
contours at the right top corner) according to the model prediction.
The radiative energy from the SXR emitting plasma for the Nov
5, 1998 flare, can be estimated as 4-7 x 1030 erg.
To estimate the lower limit of the energy released in the Nov 5,
1998 flare we made use of our extrapolated field and Melrose's
quadrupolar current-loop model. The model gave us the flare energy of
of E = 7.5 x 1029 erg which is one order lower then the
observational estimates based on the YOHKOH/SXT irradiation.
Calculations presented here explore only the large-scale magnetic
field structure in the AR. However, taking into account a possible
filamentation of the solar magnetic field, this flare could be
considered as a superposition of many small-scale reconnection events.
In this case, one would expect a variety of angles between small-scale
magnetic fluxes which would bring up the additional energy for the
flare.
The closed magnetic configuration, revealed here, naturally explains
We would like to emphasize that unlike the Kopp-Pneuman
configuration, the model presented here does not necessarily need
destabilization and eruption of the active region filament. The
filament eruption, even if it accompanies a two-ribbon flare, could be
a one of many equal possibilities to trigger a solar flare.
On the other hand, it is also known that there is no direct
link between filament eruption and TRF. Moreover, about 30\% of TRF are
not associated with active region filaments and their sudden
eruption.
Any flare model must explain not only how and where magnetic
energy is released, but also a location, shape and a topological link
between all flare ribbons and remote brightenings seen in the course of
a TRF.
©BBSO/NJIT Seminar on OCT, 2000